In my opinion yes, as a recruiter myself I would not hire a mature student for my grad scheme, there is legislation but most recrutiers work around that.

From my experience (also a mature individual who recently obtained a PhD degree), I get rejection after 1st round of interviews (and I have done my homework reading and practicing for the job interviews). In general, their feedback “Good interview but there were other candidates who had qualifications with better match” (no need to be controversial and ask them if anybody had better qualification than a PhD)

I guess maturity (which is this case involves commitment and a strong desire to get a very good job) together with good education (PhD) are serious disadvantages to land a good job out there… It’s hard to quit career progression dreams…. Sad, but it’s a shame to see that a mutual benefit (employer/employee) is compromised by last century prejudice… Anyway, wish you luck to get that graduate job.

To the recruiter who would not hire a mature student for his/her grad scheme; do you mind telling us why?

FTAO Recrutier: -

Firstly, learn to spell 'recruiter' properly.

Secondly, what you transcribe is illegal under the Age Discrimination act.

Thirdly, if you have the skills and experience, many Graduate employers actually favour mature students.

Hope that helps P Kearns :)

you see, the answer given by the person not able to spell, is typical of the problem we face in the UK, that being that it is stuck in the past, its going backwards compared to many other nations now. Experience with qualifications surely should actually put you in front of the queue ! from a logical point of view, how can that not be an asset to a business!?